Ceeker248 Youtube Vid's

Loading...

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Christians could you answer this? PT 1

Christians could you answer this ?





The answer to this is in knowing how God relates to the saved verses the unsaved. All men are sinners, yet the saved are the adopted sons of God whereas the unsaved are still in a state of being condemned. So the deciding factor is in how God see's you, not in your self-righteousness, useless rituals and false religiosity. If a son sins against his Father will he not repent? Does the sin of the son negate the relationship between him and his father? Yes and no would be the correct answers to those two questions, but let us look into this issue further.

I am not sure what Mr Ahmad's definition of the doctrine of salvation is based on. Our brethren at Carm.org have the following definition posted under salvation:

" Salvation is the "saving" of a sinner from the righteous judgment of God "

Gotquestions.org defines salvation as the following:

" Salvation is deliverance from danger or suffering "

  I would accept both of these as good working definitions of what salvation means, you could go into much more detail but that's the jest of the matter. I think it should be clear at this point why this poster is inaccurate, salvation is to be freed from the the consequence of sin(Hell, eternal separation from God's mercy) because the "saved" sinner has been redeemed from the rightful penalty of sin by the work of Christ. Christ The Savior of sinners(because sinners have nothing of value to offer God to redeem themselves, no rituals, no kufis, no hijabs, no fasting Ramadan covers sins) acted as a representative in receiving the divine wrath on our behalf(2 Corinthians 5:21), He legally justifies us before a Holy God with a Holy standard(Romans 5:1), He purchased us with His own blood(Hebrews 9:12).

  For the Christian to be "free from  sin" does not mean they have no sins, it means to be free from the curse of sin. We look forward to the return of Christ when we will be transformed from the bodies we current have that are under a fallen human nature into glorified bodies.

" in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed." 1 Corinthians 15:52

  At that time we will be free from sin in the manner Mr Ahmad understands. The work of Christ and faith in it is what guarantees us this transformation. If Mr Ahmad's understanding was correct it would mean we are not saved by Christ alone through faith alone. but salvation would be a cooperation between the work of God and man...which is not Biblical.

(Ephesians 2:8-9) - "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast.

  The protestant reformation gave us the theological summarization; Sola Fide(By Faith alone), Sola Gratia(By Grace Alone), Sola Christus(By Christ alone), Soli Deo Gloria(God's glory alone). Salvation is not about the one being saved, it's about the one doing the saving. It's the ability of the one doing the saving(God) that causes the salvation, its the one doing the saving that maintains the status of being saved. Now do not misunderstand that this means that a Christian has freedom to sin at will, Christ was not sent to die so I could sin. The children of the Most High God have a new spiritual nature that causes them to walk in sanctification, they bare fruit of good works(not to obtain salvation) that is evidence that they have obtained salvation(works are not valid before a Holy God until they are proceeded by salvation).

"You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?" Matthew 7:16

"The one who says, “I have come to know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him" 1 John 2:4

"What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it?" Romans 6:1-2

  The true Christian is a new spiritual being who for the moment(until Christ returns) is still living inside the old mortal body effected by the sin nature. He does not live a life of sin but will from time to time fall into sin because of his present reality. Because of his inner spiritual rebirth he will always repent of those mistakes because if he sinned and the Holy Spirit did not convict him to run back to his Lord and repent, then that would be a sign he was not saved. The Father will always delver his sons, nothing in this world weather it is sin or Satan will nullify the love of the Father for his children. God is the one doing the rescuing. As for the false religions they all center around sinners justifying themselves with made up rituals for idols who lack any standard of absolute holiness.

All glory and honor be to the one true God who eternally exists as Father Son and Spirit Amen!  



C.L,  2012


Read more »

Anthony Rogers vs. Ijaz Ahmad: Trinity in the Old Testament?

VIDEO: Anthony Rogers vs. Ijaz Ahmad: Trinity in the Old Testament?

Read more »

Monday, May 28, 2012

Yusuf Estes on violence and Terrorism

Yusuf Estes on violence and Terrorism

Jesus or Muhammad

Read more »

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Stealth Islamic Propaganda Shown to Six Million American Students

May 25, 2012

Stealth Islamic Propaganda Shown to Six Million American Students

By Larissa Scott
On May 16 and 17 of 2012, Channel One Network, a national distributor of educational videos and newscasts viewed daily by over 8,000 middle and high schools, aired a two-part video series, titled "Young and Muslim in America" and "Islam in America."

In "Young and Muslim in America: How being a part of Islam changed ten years ago, Part 1," students watch as Muhtasham Sifaat, 18, kneels on a prayer rug inside an empty classroom.  His voiceover explains how he moved around a lot when he was younger, but Islam has given him stability.  What is not revealed is that Mr. Sifaat is a political activist serving as a chapter president of the Muslim Students Association (MSA), one of the most radical Muslim Brotherhood front groups in America.
The MSA pledge states: "Allah is my lord.  Islam is my life.  The Koran is my guide.  The Sunna is my practice.  Jihad is my spirit.  Righteousness is my character.  Paradise is my goal.  I enjoin what is right.  I forbid what is wrong.  I will fight against oppression.  And I will die to establish Islam."
Kyle Smith, 22, gives an overview of the five pillars of Islam before the narrator explains:
Kyle, who's president of his university's Muslim Students Association, grew up in a Roman Catholic family, but converted to Islam three years ago after searching for meaning in his life (italics mine)...two of his friends led him to the religion.
Doesn't searching for meaning in life describe almost every American adolescent?  Presenting an idealized, whitewashed image of Islam and its followers, and showing how converting to Islam helps those who are lost and confused, this programming is nothing short of a disguised recruitment video pushing a religion in a public school setting.
The airing of "Islam in America: How being Muslim has changed since 9/11, Part 2" on May 17 begins with a news update on the Trayvon Martin case, which deals with the alleged racial profiling of a black teenager.  Coincidentally, the video that follows compares "Flying While Muslim" to "Driving While Black."  Students learn about Amany Killawi,19, who struggles to board airplanes:
[H]aving to be checked at the airport a couple of times is definitely not comfortable, especially if you're Muslim.  I often joke if you think driving while black is tough, try Muslim while flying.  Because it's really, really tough.
Zana Lee, 14 and wearing hijab, is filmed walking into a store, stopping in front of a candy display, and subtly pointing to a bag of Skittles.  Her voice-over:
I do think that Muslims are discriminated here in America...sometimes it happens to me.  Sometimes I could be shopping in the store, or just getting some candy from the corner store and I could just look up at the cashier and she can look at me in a certain way, and it just kinda hurts sometimes.
Since Skittles brand candy has already become part of the Trayvon Martin media narrative, portraying a hijabed Muslima shopping for Skittles at a corner store looks more like a manipulative re-enactment of the Trayvon Martin incident, designed to reinforce the victimology trope of racial profiling.

The narrator picks up the story:   ...........................  

CLICK HERE TO FINISH THE STORY 

Read more »

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Islamic Cleric: Allah Will Destroy The West at The Hands of The Muslims!

Islamic Cleric: Allah Will Destroy The West at The Hands of The Muslims!




http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_z3FPhz-LoPc/RpAw7AJiXsI/AAAAAAAAAIk/Aj3veNmA2jw/s400/jihadi.jpg

Read more »

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Western Muslims more likely to vote for leftist/socialist politicians ?

Western Muslims more likely to vote for leftist/socialist politicians ?

Sarkozy is out in France and it seems as if Muslim voters had a lot to do with his new Socialist replacement winning.


France/Islam-Election: 93 Percent of French Muslims Voted For Hollande

PARIS, 18 Jumada Al-Thani/9 May (IINA) – According to a survey of 10,000 voters conducted by Opinionway for Le Figaro (not online), 93 percent of French Muslims voted for Francois Hollande in the second round of the French election, La Vie reports.
Another poll put Muslim support for Hollande at 85 percent.
A prior Opinionway survey showed that 59 percent of Muslim voters (numbering about two million in total) voted for Hollande in the first round of the French elections, with Sarkozy only managing four percent.
“It is the mark of a true rejection of Nicolas Sarkozy” said Julien Goarant, research director at Opinionway. Sarkozy’s attempts to woo Far-right voters and question the role of Islam (especially Halal meat) in France also did not go unnoticed.
On the flip side, a poll for La Vie showed that 79 percent of practicing Catholics voted for Sarkozy, with Hollande cornering only 21 percent of their vote. But 70 percent of those considering themselves “without religion” went with Hollande, according to Le Figaro.


-------

French Muslims Overwhelmingly Supported Socialist


Saturday, May 12, 2012
francois hollande
According to stories from the International Islamic News Agency (IINA) and other news outlets, a survey of 10,000 voters documented an almost unimaginable correlation between religious identification and one’s choice for President. According to IINA, Francois Hollande was the only candidate of Muslims, while Roman Catholics overwhelming backed the failed bid by Nicolas Sarkozy to win reelection:
According to a survey of 10,000 voters conducted by Opinionway for Le Figaro (not online), 93 percent of French Muslims voted for Francois Hollande in the second round of the French election, La Vie reports.
Another poll put Muslim support for Hollande at 85 percent.
A prior Opinionway survey showed that 59 percent of Muslim voters (numbering about two million in total) voted for Hollande in the first round of the French elections, with Sarkozy only managing four percent.
“It is the mark of a true rejection of Nicolas Sarkozy” said Julien Goarant, research director at Opinionway. Sarkozy’s attempts to woo Far-right voters and question the role of Islam (especially Halal meat) in France also did not go unnoticed.

Read more »

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Muslim objections to Christ's deity, 2



CL Edwards last appearance with Dave and Sam on Jesus or Muhammad

Read more »

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

7 important points concerning the title Son of God

7 important points concerning the title Son of God


1. The title "son(s) of God" has more then one meaning and application in the Bible, as it has been said before on this blog and elsewhere words take on meaning in a context. Looking a word up in a dictionary and picking the meaning that fits your argument doesn't tell you how the author used the word, or what the author intended, or how the original readers of the text would have understood it.

2. The title "son(s) of God is used for angels " Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came among them." Job 1:6

3. The title "son(s) of God" is sometimes used in a manner bible commentators differ over because the context is not clear to them, the most famous example being "that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose." Genesis 6:2

4. The title "son(s) of God is used for God's redeemed saved by grace through faith in Christ(Christians) "But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name " John 1:12

5. The title "son of God" or as some translations capitalize "Son of God" is used as a specific title of the Messiah "He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?", Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." " Matthew 16:15-16

6. Angels are not "son(s) of God" in the same manner as believers, believers are not "son(s) of God in the same manner as angels, angels and believers are not "son(s) of God in the same exact manner as those who married the daughters of men in Genesis, and none of the previous are "son(s)s of God" in the same manner as the Messiah. And how do we know this? The context of the passages are different which tells us the term in each case is being used differently.

7. The title "son of God" with regards to the Messiah is used differently then it is used elsewhere in the bible. For example look closely at Matthew 16:15-16 " But who do you say that I am?", Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." The wider context of the dialogue between Christ and Peter is within a chapter where Christ earlier had an encounter with the Pharisees and Sadducees who rejected him and where demanding a sign. The central theme of the chapter is who is this Jesus? In fact this is all taking place in the midst of a series of encounters with the Jews. They are constantly questioning him, and he is telling them as well as showing and proving who he is.

  Earlier in another encounter Christ says "Every plant which My heavenly Father did not plant shall be uprooted." Matt 15:13, calling God Father was common among the Jews but the context shows Jesus is using the term in a unique manner for himself..God's Fatherhood as applied to him is different then the Jews in general. He go's on later to perform signs and wonders that confirm what he has said about himself. Now in the beginning of chapter 16 he runs into another group of Jews who are demanding he perform a sign, since he has already performed public of signs and wonders all over Israel this just shows they really reject him..and he exposes this. Jesus after this debate warns his disciples beware of the "leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees " which is interpreted in verse 12 as their teachings, the obviously problem with their teaching being they reject the Christ.

   Later as they continue to travel Christ decides to question his disciples and asks "
Who do people say that the Son of Man is" to the astute Bible student "Son of Man" itself is a title for the Divine Messiah see Daniel 7:13-14. The disciples give some of the common things being said about Jesus in Israel. Then Jesus asks "But who do you say that I am?", Peter answered "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God", Jesus not only affirmed his answer but said it was divine revelation from his Father confirming he was exactly who Peter just said he was. We gather from this exchange that to be Christ or Messiah is to be the Son of God as well as the Son of Man, which tells us Christ is Son of God in a unique manner different from anything else called son of God. Notice in verse 17 Christ says again just like in chapter 15, that God is his Father clearly in a way different then all others.

  In verse 27 before the close of the chapter Christ affirms he is that "Son of Man" who will come in the glory of God the Father and he will be the presiding judge at the end of time just as Daniel(Daniel 7:13-14) predicted. And what did Daniel say about the "Son of Man" he said "He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him" this is all by the approval of the Father God.  So who among the angels and men called "sons of god" is ever spoken of in this manner anywhere else in the Bible? Intelligent people can clearly see from this one example out of many others that Christ is not "a" son of God, Christ is "thy" Son of God in a manner that denotes the nature of his sonship is divine.

C.L Edwards
05/02/2012

Also see
Jesus as the Son of God


http://wallpaper4god.com/wallpapers/son-of-god_540_1024x768.jpg

Read more »

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Did Muhammad Exist?





Read more »

Ephesians 6:19
Pray also for me, that whenever I speak, words may be given me so that I will fearlessly make known the mystery of the gospel,