Why I Love Jesus But Reject Islam (Updated)

Truthful and Lyrical/
Poetical apologetic/
Ego Emi.. I AM God/
Yes it was Jesus Christ who said it/
You rather take the words of a impostor fake?/
I pray you open your eyes for Goodness sake/
Before the trumpet blows/
The Sun falls and the earth shakes/
No more wudoo or salat/
Mindless mechanical worship like Robots/
Heed this Creed/
When Christs Holy foot touches the Temple mount/
The show will stop/
And nothing will be left/
For His rejectors but the 2nd death/
before returning to Islam/
I rather die a martyr like Wycliffe/
Reformed in more ways then one/
I become a son because of the Son/
Regenerated from my Gospel hatred/
Recreated it is done!


Why I Love Jesus But Reject Islam




A Christian Response to Kamal Saleh's Islamic Video

Read more »

More Freedom .. More Responsibility

More freedom more responsibility

He must increase, but I must decrease. John 3:30 KJV

The following video spoke to me, as someone who has come out of the totalitarianism of Islam, that dictates your ever movement, being in the Liberty of Christ can feel strange. In the deen you have a schedule to live by wake up here, pray there, read this much Quran, pray again, make Qiyam now etc etc, all the while the motivation is don't anger Allah, earn more good deeds for the meezaan scale, conform to what everyone else in the community is doing, don't let your "religious" face down. In Jesus Christ who is the Savior, these are all a none factor,  because in Christianity you walk by Faith(Trust) not by sight, Jesus is the provider of our salvation He first loves us and came and got us out of the prisons we were in. There is no "cheap grace" to recline on, the motivation to do works is Grace, to the natural minded unsaved person it would seem like being given forgiveness and grace without merit would make you lazy, nothing could be further from the truth. If you are really saved and a true Christian then Christ's sacrifice should produce fruit, its not you producing the fruit because your works are worthless to God, it's God working the works in you and you yielding to Him.

¹ “I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. ² Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. ³ Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. ⁴ Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. ⁵ I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. ⁶ If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned. John 15:1-6 ESV

I f you have left the falsehood of Islam for the Truth of Christ,  give your Master better service then you gave your idol.

Read more »

Is Bart Ehrman a friend of Islam?

Check these other videos out also.....

Bart Ehrman on the Quran: The Crucifixion of Jesus & Fulfilled Prophecy

Bart Ehrman on the Qur'an

Read more »

Exposing Dawah: A look at Surah 5:72-73

Exposing Dawah: A look at Surah 5:72-73

They have certainly disbelieved who say, " Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary" while the Messiah has said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah , my Lord and your Lord." Indeed, he who associates others with Allah - Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.They have certainly disbelieved who say, " Allah is the third of three." And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment.  (Quran 5:72-73) Saheeh International, The Quran: English Meanings and Notes (publication place: Al-Muntada Al-Islami, 2011)

The Quran says They have certainly disbelieved who say, " Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary"

Commentary: Muslims argue Allah of the Quran corresponds to the Father in the Trinity and that the Father is the One God at the exclusion of the Word and Spirit, The Doctrine of the Trinity teaches that God is the Father, Word and Spirit without the Father being the Word, the Word being the Father, the Spirit being the Father or Word. Christianity does not teach the Father is the Word incarnated Jesus Christ.

The Quran then says while the Messiah has said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah , my Lord and your Lord." Indeed, he who associates others with Allah - Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers

Commentary: There is no claim of Jesus ever saying this before Muhammad(born over 600 years after Jesus) but to play the devils advocate if he said these words(and we take Allah to be a general title for deity) then there is no objections. The only objection would be that he was not referring to Allah lord of the Kabaa who at the time of Jesus life was a god of the Pagan Arabs with three daughters al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat. For more information on the Kabaa, the black stone, and Allah's daughters click HERE.

The Quran go's on to say They have certainly disbelieved who say, " Allah is the third of three." And there is no god except one God.

 
Commentary: The reference to "three" is clearly suppose to be concerning the Trinity, the problem is God is not the third of three in the Trinity, instead God is the Trinity and the Trinity is God. And we agree with the statement " there is no god except one God ". Unfortunately Muslims have been led to believe partly thanks to the Quran, that the Trinity is Tritheism(the belief in three distinct gods). The Holy Bible rejects Tritheism and so did the Church universal. If the Quran is taking Tritheists to task then we the Christian's not only agree, but proceed it in that, yet along with the Tritheists we reject all the mutilators of God including the Unitarians(Rejectors of the Multi-personal God).

Some may claim that these ayat and others like it do not address the Trinity, so the charge that whoever wrote the Quran didn't comprehend the Trinity is false. I say Muslims must pick a cohesive stance and stop citing these ayat as proofs against the Trinity,  and stop castigating it if the Quran never directly addresses it. You just can not have it both ways depending on the situation.

Read more »

'Strict Muslim' raped four women at knife point to 'punish them for being on the streets at night'

Jihad is the rightful punishment for any culture that rejects Islam and does not worship it's god. and honor's it's prophet, being raised in an environment and indoctrinated with this mentally, hearing non-Muslims refereed to as Kafirs and pigs and monkeys no doubt led 23 year old Sunny Islam to strike out on his own personal Jihad. .....

Quran Surah 3:151
We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they set up with Allah that for which He has sent down no authority, and their abode is the fire, and evil is the abode of the unjust.

Rape has always been used as a tool of war..

"   During war and armed conflict, rape is frequently used as means of psychological warfare in order to humiliate the enemy and undermine their morale. War rape is often systematic and thorough, and military leaders may actually encourage their soldiers to rape civilians. War rape may occur in a variety of situations, including institutionalised sexual slavery, war rapes associated with specific battles or massacres, and individual or isolated acts of sexual violence. War rape may also include gang rape and rape with objects.  "  source wikipedia


Excerpt from the story

" A Muslim man who raped women to 'teach them a lesson' for being on the streets at night was jailed indefinitely today because of the danger he poses to women.

Sunny Islam, 23, who comes from a strict Muslim family, dragged his terrified victims - including a 15-year-old - from the street at knifepoint, bound and assaulted them during a two-month reign of terror.

Police fear that Islam may have attacked many more.

Three of the assaults took place close to his home in Barking, east London, while a fourth occurred in nearby Forest Gate.

Judge Patricia Lees, sentencing him to a minimum of 11 years, said: 'The harm you have done to your victims is incalculable. "

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091669/Sunny-Islam-Strict-Muslim-raped-4-women-knifepoint-punish-them

Read more »

Christian math? my rely to Muslim Abdusshakoor Saafir

Christian math? my rely to Muslim Abdusshakoor Saafir 

You said: "Christian Math" refers to the mathematical absurdities in the Christian religion. For example, 1+1+1=1"

My reply: The God is one being and One being only, God eternally exists as three persons, these three persons are not three separate individual gods. For example take Human beings created in the image of God, I am one individual human being I am comprised of Spirit mind and Body, my Spirit is not a separate human being, my Mind is not a separate human being and my Body is not a separate human being, they are One human being. A human being is Spirit Mind and Body, In like manner God is Father Word and Spirit.

You said: "Why would you multiply (Jesus) * (Father)* (white dove spirit)? This is an addition problem! Still if you are going to multiply then you must admit you have a multiple god! And we can check this by dividing your god! (1/1)/1= 1 meaning your god's power is divided 3 ways. Why believe in a god that shares power? With 2 others? Is your god not strong enough to survive without the other 2?"

My reply: The Spirit of God is not a white dove, in the Gospel's it does describe that the Spirit came down from heaven "like" a dove the text says nowhere that it is or was a dove.

No where in the Biblical text does it say God is a multiplication of Father x Son x Spirit. But 1x1x1 does equal 1..are you disputing that fact, nothing you say after this point refutes that 1x1x1 equals 1, nor could you or anyone else ever refute that as a fact.

If God existing as three hypostasis means these hypostasis are three gods, then apply your logic to human being's.thier Mind spirit and Body must be three human beings? Protons, Neutrons and nucleus must be three Atoms? Land water and Air must be three Earths? Man woman and Child must be three families?

God can not be divided because God is One, your idea that God could be divided is not a part of Christian theology..if you insist that it is, then you are merely inventing a staw-man and then attacking it with the claim that this is what Christianity teaches. Everything else you said is a part of your straw man. The belief that there are three gods is called Tritheism, Thriteism was condemned universally by Christianity before Muhammad, the Quran, the Sunnah and Islam came into existence.

You said: " If your god is 1 and sharing power 3 ways, that would mean each of your gods only = 1/3 of a god, that would make Jesus 1/6 god and 1/6 man since he is like the Greek demigods!"

My reply: Again our God is not One sharing power three ways, our God is one period, if existing as Father Son and Holy Spirit diminishes God's Divine nature..then the same logic should be applied to you and me..being comprised of Mind Body and Spirit should diminish our human nature..such a idea is ridiculous being that a human being is a Mind body and a Spirit..so the same logic applies to the one we were created in who's Image, being God is to be Father Son and Spirit, any other concept is a mutilation of God.

Know who has any biblical and theological knowledge would accuse the Christian God of being anything like a Greek demi-god these are two separate and opposing ideas.

You said: "The second Christian mathematical absurdity is the Jesus is fully 100% man and fully 100% god. 100% + 100% = 200%. Jesus can't be 200% of anything. 1 whole = 100%. Let's rationalize that Jesus is 100 parts god, 100 parts man, that would mean Jesus is 50% god, 50% man! Jesus is now a demigod like Hercules of Greek mythology except Herc has bigger muscles! ;) Being fully god and fully man is also a contradiction! You can't be man and God at the same time! You can't be mortal and immortal at the same time! You can't be the Creator and a creation of God at the same time! It's a logical contradiction!"

My reply: This shows your naturalistic thinking, unfortunately Muslims wish to become secularist when it come to Christianity then revert back to supernatrualism when it comes to Islam..that is a logical inconstancy. God is not bound by natural or the laws of natural, God can transcend and break the laws of nature anytime God pleases and it would be easy. If your concept of a god can not perform supernatural events then it's not a true god.

Also to regulate Divinity to being 100% of anything is a total misunderstanding of the whole concept of Divinity. God is infinite and eternal with no limits. The incarnation was not a limited amount of Divinity taking on human natural it was infinite all powerful God lord of natural law taking a human nature and doing what ever God pleased to do with it.. again if your concept of god can not do such an thing then it's not a real god.

If.. just for arguments sake we say 100% God plus 100% man was accurate, it would not equal 50% God 50% man.. again if you want to be a secular humanist and materialist in this issue you better be one with Allah's asma was sifat but we will talk about that later.

You are right I can not be God and man at the same time but God can, if your god is incapable of this then its not a true god. Again you show that you are uneducated in Christian theology, Jesus was not mortal and immortal in natural at the same time in the same way, Jesus had two naturals Divine and human,being God from eternity he took a second additional natural of a human being, this act did not cancel his divine natural. A logical contradiction is for two or more things to be the same in the same way at the same time,,which is not Christian theology.

Read more »

The Golden Age of Islam - A Second Look

Great article came to my attention thanks to David Wood over at www.answeringmuslims.com about the supposed Islamic golden age.

Here is a excerpt...

Andrew Bostom has skewered the myth that Cordoba was a model of ecumenism:

Expanding upon Jane Gerber's thesis about the "garish" myth of a "Golden Age," the late Richard Fletcher (in hisMoorish Spain) offered a fair assessment of interfaith relationships in Muslim Spain and his view of additional contemporary currents responsible for obfuscating that history:

The witness of those who lived through the horrors of the Berber conquest, of the Andalusian fitnah[ordeal] in the early eleventh century, of the Almoravid invasion — to mention only a few disruptive episodes — must give it [i.e.: the roseate view of Muslim Spain] the lie.

The simple and verifiable historical truth is that Moorish Spain was more often a land of turmoil than it was of tranquility. … Tolerance? Ask the Jews of Granada who were massacred in 1066, or the Christians who were deported by the Almoravids to Morocco in 1126 (like the Moriscos five centuries later). … In the second half of the twentieth century a new agent of obfuscation makes its appearance: the guilt of the liberal conscience, which sees the evils of colonialism — assumed rather than demonstrated — foreshadowed in the Christian conquest of al-Andalus and the persecution of the Moriscos (but not, oddly, in the Moorish conquest and colonization). Stir the mix well and issue it free to credulous academics and media persons throughout the Western world. Then pour it generously over the truth … in the cultural conditions that prevail in the West today, the past has to be marketed, and to be successfully marketed, it has to be attractively packaged. Medieval Spain in a state of nature lacks wide appeal. Self-indulgent fantasies of glamour … do wonders for sharpening its image. But Moorish Spain was not a tolerant and enlightened society even in its most cultivated epoch.

To read the whole text click HERE 

Read more »

The Quran's inaccurate description of the Trinity

The Quran's inaccurate description of the Trinity

Read more »

God's Grace or Self Righteous Suicide ?

God's Grace or Self Righteous Suicide ?

The difference between Christianity and Islam boils down to the issue of Sin :


Islam and Christianity both agree there is a after life and a Paradise and know one can enter it accept they have a Pure Heart. 


Islam says if you strive hard, be really religious and become a Muhsin(A good doer) upon Ihsan(The highest level of Islamic spirituality) you can purify your own heart and earn yourself a place in this Garden. As for the vast majority of everyone else they will have to take God's wrath upon themselves by being burned in hell until they atone for their Sins. How long a person stays in the fire and how much wrath they take is all up to the will of God..it could be 50 years or it could be 50,000 years. 


Christianity on the other hand says man is totally depraved and a natural born habitual Sinner. God's standard's of obedience is that you never disobey Him not even once.. which mankind no matter how hard it tries can ever accomplish. Every human being know matter how religious or spiritual they are will always fall and Sin sooner or later. Sinners rightfully deserve God's wrath because God has decreed so, but again weak imperfect humans could never stand under His wrath, Hell is not temporarily it's eternal you never get out. As hopeless as that sounds and man's ability to save himself is hopeless.. out of God's Love and  Mercy He provided a substitute so that anyone who's has complete Faith in it can be saved. God provided the promised Messiah; God the only perfect one come to the world to live the life of a perfect Muhsin that you are too weak to accomplish and to take the wrath you are to frail to stand under. 


That's the bottom line, if you trust in yourself and you think you can be self righteous then you pick Islam, if you know you are sinner who needs Grace you pick Jesus Christ.

Read more »

Will Jizya return?: Copt Priest Prefers Martyrdom to Slave Tax in Egypt

Under Islamic law, jizya or jizyah (Arabic: جزية‎ ǧizyah IPA: [dʒizja]; Ottoman Turkish: cizye; both derived from Pahlavi and possibly from Aramaicgaziyat^[1]) is a per capita tax levied on a section of an Islamic state's non-Muslim citizens, who meet certain criteria. 

KNOXVILLE, TN (Catholic Online) - After the sweeping political victories Islamists made in the early round of elections in Egypt, the Deputy Patriarch of the Coptic Catholic Church Yohanna Qulta was interviewed on Arab television concerning the looming threat that Egypt's Christian communities will face in an Islamist society. The interview gives us unusual insight into the mind and heart of our Coptic brothers and sisters.

Although the interview is only a few minutes long, the Deputy Patriarch's comments are wide-ranging and pack a powerful punch.

To read the full article click HERE

Read more »

Who and What is the suffering servant Isaiah predicted in Ch 53?

You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me,  Jesus the Messiah

Who is the suffering servant Isaiah predicted? Has He came? Is He still to come? What is Islam's answer? why is he called servant and Mighty God at the same time?

According to Islam the Bible is corrupted and useless and you should not pay attention or care about it's Prophecies. The suffering Servant is being awaited by the Jews, and ignored by the Muslims...but have you  read Isaiah chapter 53 and made up your own mind?

Other resources:

The Promised Exaltation Of God's Suffering Servant

Audio by  Dr. Arturo Azurdia III

Read more »

Exposing Dawah: The Art of Selling Falsehood

Exposing Dawah: The Art of Selling Falsehood 

The logical inconsistent antagonist from among the A'immah and Du'at see no issue in using the (Anti-theist) arguments of liberals, secularist , materialists, atheist, and agnostics while refusing to ever use that same line of thinking on Islam's religious text, aqeedah, or fiqh. I think everyone reading this has heard of Bart Ehrman, He is a textual critic who left Christianity and became a agnostic, if you listen to dawahist like Yusa Evens who rely heavily on the views of  Bart Ehrman  you would think He was the beginning of any authoritative view on the issue of the New Testament. The reality is everyone in the field doesn't agree with Mr Ehrman, foremost of them was his own teacher Bruce  Metzger(died 2007 A.D), who knowing the same evidence and arguments as Mr Ehrman remained a Theist and Christian until the end of his life. Another example would be Darrell Bock a scholar in His own right who has debated Mr Ehrman. 

I have even had the displeasure of antagonistic Muslims telling me "all your Christian scholars say the Bible is corrupted", a common word repeated in the course of giving "dawah" to non-Muslims. The sad part is many Muslims think that is true, I guess they never heard of the Chicago statement of inerrancy signed by 200 Christian scholars. Maybe if logical consistency was important when giving dawh these people would have realized on their own that if someone denies the Bible they are not a real Christian the same way if someone denied the Quran they couldn't be a real Muslim. I guess it's all fair when making Jihad with the pen!

Everything in Islam begins with Muhammad and the Quran so this methodology of giving dawah by attacking Faith even if it's from an Anti-theist position originated there. If one looks at the first of the two Shahadah's "I bear witness that there is no god but Allah",  Muslim scholars teach that it is divided between a negation and a affirmation. One doesn't begin Islam with a affirmation of what the religion positively teaches, no you begin it with a negation of all belief..even in God himself "la ilaha / There is no god". You can not enter into Islam until you make a statement of Atheism, and then once you recite there is no God, you recite that Allah of Arabia(the lord of the Kabaa in Mecca) is a god. 


This is the line of thinking you would expect from an Anti-Christ religion, and if there is any doubt Muhammad and his revelations are Anti-Christ, I urge you to stop reading and watch my intense Bible study video entitled "What is a Anti-Christ vol 1" that deals with 1 John 2:17-19. In summery the title Anti-Christ is applied to any individual, group, or ideology that seeks to negate Jesus Christ of the Bible and replace Him with another counterfeit. And who did Islam attempt to replace Christ with after 600 some odd years of Christianity affirming that He was thy Divine Messiah promised by the Prophets and Messengers thousands of year prior? I say it wasn't Allah it was Muhammad, because even mere belief in Allah alone brings know one salvation in Islam until they affirm the second Shahadah " Muhammad is His Messenger".

"  All the different groups in the world are believers in the Oneness of God [tawhid], whether they be bhangis, choorhay-chamaar,Christians, or some other group, but why are they accursed (mala’un)? Because they only say, ’There is no god but Allah’ but omit ‘Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah’. " ... "  When the blessed name of the Chief of Both the Worlds (Muhammad), sal Allahu alayhi wa sallam, comes on one’s tongue, all one’s lifetime of blasphemy [kufr], polytheism [shirk], and all one’s sins are erased. "  Naqshbandi Sufi Master Jamaat Ali Shah Sahib quds-sirruhu 

If one wanted to affirm that there is no god but God out of a belief in monotheism, in Islam this would never be accepted(i.e make you Muslim and render you life, blood and wealth halal-off limits to plunder) until you "partnered" that statement with the second shahadah affirming Muhammad. This is the tradition of Islam and the fiqh(legal) ruling of all it's Schools of thought, yet it seems strange when we read passages in the Quran like this that seem to contradict that notion....

"God bears witness that there is no god except He, and so do the angels and THOSE WHO POSSESS KNOWLEDGE. Truthfully and equitably, He is the absolute god; there is no god but He, the Almighty, Most wise." 3:18 

To add to this dilemma every Muslim's Salat(obligatory daily ritual prayer) is incomplete and in danger of rejection until they recite the tashahhud prayer. The tashahhud has many versions but the most common rendered into English is " All compliments, prayers and pure words are due to Allah. Peace be upon you O Prophet, and (on you Prophet be) the mercy of Allah and His blessings. Peace be upon us, and on the righteous slaves of Allah. I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, and I bear witness that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger ". Besides again having to mention Muhammad alongside of God, a keen eye should notice that the Muslim must directly address Muhammad during this act of worship, which in any other circumstance would be considered shirk(making a partner with God/polytheism).

Not only is Muhammad to be placed along side of God in one's confession of faith, in violation the First Commandment and Islam's own prohibition on making created beings God's partners, one makes invocations directly to Muhammad during your prayers, but along side all that if you were to refrain from these things out of fear of shirk your Islam is nullified and your life, blood and wealth is halal until you repent. We are told Muhammad is just another Messenger from among the supposed 125,000 other Messengers..a mere human slave, yet if you recite "There is no god but God and Jesus is his Messenger or Hud is His Messenger etc etc" this shahadatan will be rejected and again your life, blood and wealth will still be halal until you confess Muhammad. 

It is clear Muhammad is not just another Messenger and He is intended to be a replacement for the Lord Jesus Christ. Muhammad is to be called Lord(Sayyid) this is one of his 99 names(Muhammad has 99 names like God in Islam), 600 years before Muhammad, the Quran and Islam existed the disciples were claiming Christ Lord and Master, but if you say Jesus is Lord and Master in most Muslim country's today you risk being killed....

"  Undoubtedly referring to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as “sayyid (master)” is quite valid, for he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is our master, and indeed the master of all of mankind. " Salafi Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid 

Not just that but you have classical Muslim scholars saying and authenticating hadeeth that said Muhammad is the "Light" of God, and the whole universe was created just for him to rule over, that Muhammad's soul "Haqiqat al Muhammadiyyah"( The Muhammadan reality)  is the Logos.. the vary essence of reality. You can read about all this in detail HERE.

Muhammad's Quran has the unmitigated gall to deny one of the most attested facts of history the death burial and resurrection of Jesus, yet Islam teachers Muhammad's body after death was not consumed by the gave and that Allah returned His "ruh"(spirit) to Him and He is presently alive in the gave. Not only Is He alive in the gave, but He hears the invocations offered to Him know matter where the invoker may be in creation(All-hearing? All-aware? ) and He replies back.  You can read more about that HERE.

Muhammad applies to himself the role of the eternal high priest who can enter the Holy of Holies God's throne room, like he supposedly did during His Miraj. He will go before God's throne and intercede on the behave of mankind on the Day of judgement, all of these things the Book of Hebrews claims for Jesus Christ. You can read more about this HERE and HERE.

As mentioned before Muhammad just like Allah has 99 names, and from among them are Al Mustapha the chosen one, Al Munji the Savior and Deliverer, As Shafi the Healer, Mujtaba the Elect pre-ordained promised one, Amir the Commander and Master, Haqq the Truth, Awwal the first, Akhir the last, Mubashsir bringer of the Good news, Mahmud the praised one. You can find the same or similar descriptions and names for Jesus Christ in the Holy Bible.

Not only does Muhammad negate Jesus Christ and then replace him in Islam but just as 1 John 2:17-19 says a attribute of the many Anti-Christ who would emerge in the last days is they originally being close to or among the Church....

" They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us." 

When you examine Muhammad pre-Islamic life prior to His claims of Prophet-hood,  you see that He had numerous affiliations to Christianity. According to Islamic sources two of the biggest religious luminaries Muhammad came in contact with were Waraqa ibn Naufal a leader of the heretical Ebionite sect in Hijaz(also relative by blood and marriage), Muhammad was a member of the Ahnaf(al-Hanafiyyah) whom Waraqa was a founder of, and when Muhammad had his visitation from the claimed angel Jibrail, His wife Khadijah took him immediately to consult with Waraqa who is the one to tell Muhammad He was a prophet.

Muhammad's pre-Islamic Christian connection had a earlier manifestation in his meeting of Sergius the Monk aka Bahira during a trip to Syrian. Bahira like Waraqa was said to be a  heretic, during the middle ages it was highly speculated that it was this Bahira that was giving Muhammad information to put into the Quran. The Quran itself records troubling accusations about Muhammad being accused of receiving His "revelations" from a human source... 

Surah 25:4-5: " Those who disbelieve say: "This is nothing but a lie that he has invented, and others have helped him in it.'' In fact, they have produced an unjust wrong and a lie.  And they say: "Tales of the ancients which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon. "

Also the Quran records....

Surah 16:103 "And indeed We know that they (polytheists and pagans) say: "It is only a human being who teaches him.'' The tongue of the man they refer to is foreign, while this (the Qur'an) is (in) a clear Arabic tongue (  My Note: this was a Christian blacksmith whom the Prophet (s) used to frequent. source Tafsir al-Jalalayn ).

Tafsir Ibn Kathir says regrading Surah 25:4-5 " (and others have helped him in it.) means, he asked other people to help him compile it., " (And they say: "Tales of the ancients which he has written down...'') meaning, the ancients wrote them down, and he has copied it.", "(and they are dictated to him) means, they are read or recited to him.". 

 "Husain the commentator says about this passage that the Prophet was in the habit of going every evening to a Christian to hear the Taurat and Injil." (Hughes' Dictionary of Islam, p. 30, quoting Tafsir-i-Husaini, Sale p. 223 and Muir's Life of Mahomet, p. 72) 

Muhammad was accused of merely reciting the tales of the ancients copied from Christians and Jew's as well as from Persians " It is reported that when Nasr bin Khalid had said to Abu Sufyan, Atbah and Shaybah that the Holy Prophet only recited the tales of the ancients, and he could also relate many fables of the Persians, these verses were revealed."  source Tafsir of Ayatullah Puya on Surah 6:25

There was also the individual Zaid bin 'Amr bin Nufail who befriended Muhammad before He ever claimed Prophet-hood, who having returned to mecca from Syria was also a Ahnaf(al-Hanafiyyah) , having religious teachings about monotheism, slaughtering only for God, and saving the lives of girl children whom the Meccans would kill them after birth..all things Muhammad would later incorporate into Islam. These things are reported in many ahadeeth and in Ibn Ishaq’s Siratu’Rasul.

There also was ibn Qumta a convert to Islam from Christianity who returned back to Christianity , it is narrated about him...

"Narrated Anas: There was a Christian who embraced Islam and read Surat-al-Baqara and Al-Imran, and he used to write (the revelations) for the Prophet. Later on he returned to Christianity again and he used to say: "Muhammad knows nothing but what I have written for him ....."   Bukhari Volume 4, Book 56, Number 814
And similar to Ibn Qumta there was Abdallah b. Sa‘ad b. Abi Sarh whom it is narrated ...

"  It was only a Christian slave who was teaching him [Mohammed]; I used to write to him and change whatever I wanted. " The Origins of the Koran:Classic Essays on Islam's Holy Book

As we see the call to Islam is really a call to false man made religion, and a dastardly trick to "call" humankind away from it's only means of salvation and justification The Gospel of Jesus Christ. I to was fooled by this call for a time but by the Grace of God almighty I have been "Called"  out form the world to be a son of God spiritually transformed from the inside out. Now I stand on the true Faith of Abraham alayhi salam, Faith in the Divine Messiah the ultimate Eid al-Adha sacrifice perfect and pure provided by God himself. 

EX Muslims For Christ

Read more »

Salafi talib ul Ilm Abu Taubah pleads guilty to felony Gun charges

I used to enjoy Abu Taubah's lectures he ran a popular online Islamic studies site The Fiks(fundamental Islamic knowledge seminary) . He studied in Dammaj Yemen along with other Islamic centers in the Muslim world. Its a really sad situation for his children and wives, another case of some born and raised in America enjoying freedoms and a standard of living he would have never have enjoyed in dar ul Islam, but being corrupted by ideology to hate and oppose his own country, and all across West Philadelphia, New York, Detroit, Ohio and other places thousands of others are being indoctrinated with the same cultic mentality(willing to sell themselves and others into destruction for the false prophet Muhammad). My own people my black people ruining their lives and children lives for Islam the vary religion that sold their ancestors into slavery, I cannot and will not rest and allow this to happen in front of me in my Nation with out speaking out! Many of us were fooled but thanks be to Lord Jesus Christ the light has come!
Here is a video of Abu Taubah teaching on the totalitarian Islamic ideology of Al walaa wa Baraa(allegiance to Islam and the Muslims and hatred for everything outside of Islam and non-Muslims). 

Orlando Imam Pleads Guilty To Felony Gun Charge

Marcus Dwayne Robertson aka Imam Abu Taubah

Orlando Imam Marcus Dwayne Robertson plead guilty to, “…knowingly possess in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce a firearm (.45 caliber) and ammunition, and did knowingly receive a firearm and ammunition which had been shipped and transported in interstate and foreign commerce possession of a firearm by a previously convicted felon.  Link here to the original Criminal Complaint

Robertson’s lawyer Donald R. West from the Office of the Federal Defender, Orlando, FL concurred with his clients wish to offer a guilty plea on the felony gun charge.

Assistant United States Attorney, Roger B. Handberg, prosecuted the case on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorney’s Office. The Honorable Gregory A. Presnell presided over the “Change of Plea” hearing Case# 6:11-CR-002770GAP-GJK-1   USA v. Marcus Dwayne Robertson.

What was not brought up at the “Change of Plea” hearing wasCase No. 6:11-mj-1380 USA v. Marcus Dwayne Robertson filed on August 24, 2011.  This case is a “Notice of Intent to use Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Information (FISA).  FISA identifies two categories of potential targets for surveillance.  The first category is a foreign power.  The Second category are “agents of foreign powers.”  FISA has been a productive tool in combating foreign governments intelligence gathering efforts but has since expanded to terrorism related cases involving foreign governments.

A poster at the Internet Hagganah website makes a well researched guess as to why Imam Richardson may have plead guilty to the felony gun charge. (Source)

In Brooklyn, NY during the early 90s, Abu Taubah and a group of young Muslims executed a number of postal office and bank robberies under the direction of Abu Taubah, who used his military expertise to plan the armed robberies. When the young men and a sister were finally apprehended by authorities, Abu Taubah (Dwayne Richardson) turned to a federal witness testifying against the very Muslims he trained to commit crimes.

This is public record and here is a link to court document pertaining to this case. Type Ctrl+F then enter Abu Taubah’s name Roberson and you will see public record of him snitching.

In aiding the prosecution, Abu Taubah received a mere 4 year sentence in prison. The Muslims, his friends, who he testified against are mostly all still in prison and will never be released.

Darryl Board release date 2041. Sentenced to 56 years in prison because of Abu Taubah’s testimony.

Craig Williams release date unknown. Sentenced to 160 years in prison

And there are others who are currently still in prison for participating in criminal activity WITH ABU TAUBAH.

His arrest is well-deserved. Perhaps the government wanted him to work for them AGAIN and he turned them down?

And now Imam Richardson may have flipped again by changing his not guilty plea to guilty.

To finish reading the rest of this article click HERE

Read more »

Take me to your leader oh Muslim

Muhammad the Prophet of Islam said: "My livelihood is under the shade of my spear, and he who disobeys my orders will be humiliated."
(Sahih Bukhari, p.408, vol.1) 

Jesus the Christ of God said: "It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God."  Matt 4:4
"And what you told me about the evils done by Christians—these people were Christians in name only. They disobeyed the word of Christ and they were led astray by the desires of their hearts. The Bible says, ‘The heart of man is deceitful.’ Because of this, you will see no difference between the actions of Muslims who kill and destroy and the actions of Christians who kill and destroy. The difference is in whether or not they are following the example of their leader" (Mark Gabriel, Jesus and Muhammad, p. 141).

The above quote illustrates the fundamental difference between violence and atrocities committed by Christians and violence and atrocities committed by Muslims. Real Christianity is following the real historical person Jesus Christ(Just like real Islam is following the historical person Muhammad), it is not following the Visigoths, the knights Templar, or southern white slave holders. In fact following these people may render your claim to Christianity null and void because you may be opposing the Master the Messiah the "point" of  Christianity.  From the life of Messiah I can learn how to walk in uncompromising holiness, How to rightly divide scripture, how to Love my enemy and forgive them, how to have a Father and son relationship with God, how to do the will of the Father until death. I could not learn these things from Muhammad or I would still be a Muslim to this day.

On the other hand just like there are things I get from Jesus that I could never get from Muhammad , the opposite is also true. If I want to learn how to be a dictator, how to establish a totalitarian regime, how to use war booty to gain loyalty, how to raid a town, how to enslave another human being, how to juggle multiply women, how to lie as means of deceptive warfare, I can not go to the record of Jesus Christs and learn these things, but I can go to the life of Muhammad and master these skills.

And that's the bottom line, you can drone on and on but at the end of the day it boils down to Jesus or Muhammad, which one will lead you to God? When we want to examine the Body we first look to the head not the feet or the ankles, Jesus and Muhammad are the heads and hearts of their religions, the spirit of the two faiths follows from their lives.  We are not foolish enough to think everything a Muslim says and does represents what Islam really is, when I post something from the numerous examples of atrocious behaviors from Muslims it's because it conforms the behavior of Muhammad and his Companions."So now we have both Jesus and Muhammad at the end of their lives returning to the cities that housed the center of spiritual life for their peoples. Muhammad returned as a conqueror. As we shall see, Jesus returned as a sacrifice" (Mark Gabriel, Jesus and Muhammad, p. 62).

Read more »